Sudan Under Fire: Chemical Weapons Allegations Trigger US Sanctions Amidst a Shadowy Proxy War

The already catastrophic civil war in Sudan takes a dark turn as the US announces sanctions following shocking allegations of chemical weapon use by the Sudanese military. We delve into this disturbing development, the impending sanctions, and the dangerous web of foreign powers fueling this devastating conflict, including the UAE's increasingly scrutinized role.

Brenda Ochieng'
May 28, 2025
The ongoing tragedy in Sudan has just plunged into an even more disturbing realm. The United States has dropped a bombshell, announcing sanctions against the nation following a grim determination: the Sudanese military allegedly deployed chemical weapons during the relentless civil war that has already claimed tens of thousands of lives and displaced millions. This isn't just another escalation; it's a chilling development that casts a dark shadow over an already horrific humanitarian crisis.
According to the US government, this determination was made under the Chemical and Biological Weapons Control and Warfare Elimination Act of 1991 (the CBW Act), concluding that the Sudanese government crossed a terrifying line in 2024. Following a mandatory 15-day Congressional notification period, the repercussions are set to hit around June 6th, with the US imposing significant sanctions. These measures include restrictions on American exports to Sudan and limitations on access to US government lines of credit, further isolating a nation already teetering on the brink.
The US has not minced words, publicly calling on the Sudanese government to immediately cease all use of these banned weapons and to uphold its obligations under the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). This isn't the first time Washington has wielded its punitive power in response to the Sudanese conflict. Back in January, General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, the head of the Sudanese Armed Forces, was personally sanctioned for what the US deemed his choice of war over peaceful negotiations.
The civil war, erupting in April 2023, has morphed into what the United Nations chillingly describes as one of the world's worst humanitarian disasters. Beyond the staggering death toll and the millions uprooted from their homes, the conflict has metastasized into a dangerous proxy war, drawing in a rogues' gallery of foreign powers vying for influence in the volatile region. Russia, Iran, and Turkey have all been implicated, but the involvement of the United Arab Emirates (UAE) has come under increasing and intense scrutiny.
Whispers and reports have long suggested the UAE's hand in the conflict, and the narrative took a potentially incriminating turn with the discovery of Bulgarian-made weapons among ammunition used by Sudanese rebel forces. This revelation has cast a harsh spotlight on the UAE's alleged role in arming one side of the brutal conflict, further fueling the proxy war dynamic.

Adding another layer of intrigue, just this past April, UAE state media, via the WAM news agency, reported a seemingly unrelated incident: the interception of a massive illegal arms shipment linked to Sudanese military figures. Security agents at an undisclosed airport reportedly discovered around five million rounds of ammunition on a private jet, leading to several arrests. The timing of this interception, amidst the backdrop of accusations of chemical weapon use and the UAE's alleged support for rebel factions, raises uncomfortable questions about the flow of arms into the war-torn nation.
The allegations of chemical weapon use mark a terrifying escalation in a conflict already defined by unimaginable suffering. If confirmed, it would constitute a grave violation of international law and further deepen the chasm of mistrust and animosity between the warring factions. The impending US sanctions are a clear signal of international condemnation, but whether they will be enough to halt the bloodshed and the alleged use of banned weapons remains to seen.
The situation in Sudan is a complex and deeply troubling tapestry woven with threads of internal conflict, regional power plays, and now, the horrifying specter of chemical warfare. As the US prepares to tighten the screws with sanctions, the world watches with bated breath, hoping for an end to the violence and a pathway towards peace in a nation teetering on the edge of absolute catastrophe. The unfolding drama is a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of unchecked conflict and the shadowy roles that foreign powers can play in fueling the flames of war.

About the Author

Brenda Ochieng'

Brenda Ochieng'

Brenda Ochieng' is a passionate storyteller and film enthusiast. With a background in film and video production and she brings a unique blend of creativity and technical expertise to her work. As a dedicated blogger, Brenda loves sharing insights on production techniques, blogging, and the art of storytelling. She is also a skilled editor and communicator, bringing a fresh perspective to her writing. Join Brenda as she delves into the captivating world of entertainment and news, sharing her knowledge and passion with you.

Share this article

More Articles You Might Like

A Costly Mistake? How a New $250 Visa Fee Puts a $9.4 Billion US Tourism Industry at Risk
International Desk

A Costly Mistake? How a New $250 Visa Fee Puts a $9.4 Billion US Tourism Industry at Risk

A new $250 visa fee is poised to create a significant financial barrier for African tourists, potentially costing the US economy a staggering $9.4 billion. This article explores the economic fallout of this policy, its impact on travel, and the wider implications for US-Africa relations.

8 hours ago
Discover Why the African Union is Abandoning the Colonial Map
International Desk

Discover Why the African Union is Abandoning the Colonial Map

The African Union has called for a monumental shift, urging the world to replace the centuries-old Mercator map with a new, more accurate projection. This article explores the history of the distorted map, the symbolic power of this change, and the broader debate over what truly defines Africa’s place in the world.

8 hours ago
DIRCO Fires Back: Why South Africa is Disputing the US Human Rights Report
International Desk

DIRCO Fires Back: Why South Africa is Disputing the US Human Rights Report

South Africa’s Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) has officially denounced the “South Africa 2024 Human Rights Report” from the United States as inaccurate and deeply flawed. This article explores the core disagreements between the two nations, from land expropriation and extrajudicial killings to the differing views of the UN, and the ongoing diplomatic friction caused by the report.

5 days ago