Senators Edwin Sifuna (Nairobi) and Samson Cherargei (Nandi) found themselves embroiled in a heated exchange, triggered by the casual yet potent use of political slogans. This incident not only highlighted the ever-present tension between formal parliamentary proceedings and informal political messaging but also underscored the deep rifts within the nation's political discourse.
The catalyst for the clash emerged as Senator Cherargei delivered a statement concerning the Kaptagat Integrated Conservation Programme. Foreshadowing the impending friction, he notably requested the Speaker’s protection before proceeding. His statement, initially about conservation efforts, quickly veered into a politically charged territory when he referred to President William Ruto as "a man of tutam." This seemingly innocuous phrase, while resonating with government allies, immediately drew the ire of the opposition bench, setting the stage for Senator Sifuna's dramatic intervention.
Senator Sifuna, visibly displeased by the political insinuation within a formal statement, rose on a point of order. His challenge was sharp and direct: "Honourable Speaker, the rules of this House require that statements approved by your office be read exactly as passed. Can we confirm whether the use of ‘tutam’ was part of the approved text?” He went on to vehemently assert the sanctity of the legislative chamber, declaring, "This is not a place for jokes. We are not here to play games. Let him confirm to us whether that was part of the statement.” Sifuna's impassioned remarks, which included a dismissive "We don't waste time listening to rubbish," further stoked the flames, even inadvertently irking some members by repeatedly referring to the Lady Speaker as "Mr. Speaker." He unequivocally warned Cherargei to reserve such political pronouncements for "rallies in Kapsabet," emphasizing the seriousness of Senate business.
Sifuna's use of the term "rubbish" prompted immediate repercussions within the House, compelling the Speaker to instruct him to withdraw the statement and apologize. The session briefly spiraled into chaos as Senators erupted in heckling, particularly fueled by the highly charged "wantam" versus "tutam" slogans. Amidst the din, Cherargei struggled to resume his speech, highlighting the breakdown of parliamentary order in the face of escalating political fervor.
At the heart of this parliamentary skirmish lie two potent political slogans that encapsulate the current power dynamics in Kenya. The term "wantam," meaning "one term," gained significant traction, particularly popularized by former Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua. This slogan implies a limited single term for the current administration and has featured prominently in recent opposition rallies and online political movements. In direct response, government allies have propagated "tutam," hinting at President Ruto's anticipated second term in office. These phrases are not mere words; they are symbols of deep-seated political aspirations and divisions.
