Elon Musk and South Africa Clash Over Ownership Laws and Internet Access

Musk, known for his unfiltered candor on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), has voiced his discontent with South Africa's economic policies. His primary grievance centers around land reform legislation and internet licensing requirements that aim to rectify historical inequalities from the apartheid era

Pauline Afande
March 12, 2025
Elon Musk, the South African-born billionaire and now the world’s richest man, has recently thrust his birthplace into the spotlight, but not for the reasons one might expect. Instead of celebrating the amazing culture and emerging economy of South Africa, Musk is venting his frustrations about the country’s Black ownership laws, claiming they stifle his ability to roll out his ambitious satellite internet service, Starlink.
Musk, known for his unfiltered candor on social media platform X (formerly Twitter), has voiced his discontent with South Africa's economic policies. His primary grievance centers around land reform legislation and internet licensing requirements that aim to rectify historical inequalities from the apartheid era. The irony here is displayed of a man who has thrived in a capitalist system appears uncomfortable with policies aimed at fostering inclusivity and readdressing past wrongs.
Elon Musk's comments may raise eyebrows, after all, he is an emblem of modern capitalism and an entrepreneur who has scaled heights unimagined by the average person. Yet, it’s hard to ignore the connotation that his wealth and privilege create a contrasting narrative against the backdrop of a country still grappling with the repercussions of institutionalized racism.
When Musk criticized South Africa’s ownership requirements as “racist,” he entered a complex and sensitive conversation. The response from the South African government was swift. President Cyril Ramaphosa firmly stated that the nation “will not be bullied” and reinforced the importance of policies intended to benefit the historically marginalized populations.
But just what are these ownership laws that Musk finds so limiting? Enter the Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) policy. This is a controversial initiative inaugurated in 2003 aimed at fostering economic equality in a post-apartheid landscape. This framework encourages the inclusion of Black South Africans who were previously excluded from major economic activities, through ownership quotas, skills development programs, tax incentives, and preferential procurement.
While the theory behind B-BBEE is well-intentioned, its execution has drawn sharp criticism. Many businesses reportedly treat compliance as little more than a checkbox exercise. This is a way to placate regulations without enacting profound change. Corruption has further muddied the waters, with a handful of elite benefitting while the broader population continues to struggle. The result will be a drop in Black-owned businesses from a hopeful 60% in 2019 to a staggering decline after the COVID-19 pandemic, as revealed by the B-BBEE Commission.
Statistics, however, don’t capture the spirit of a nation. A staggering 32% unemployment rate holds South Africa in the grips of economic stranglehold, branding it the most unequal country in the world. The challenges are overwhelming, creating a complex backdrop against which the cacophony of Musk’s criticisms screams louder.
But for many South Africans, the very concept of land ownership and access to economic opportunity is intertwined with their ancestral histories, struggles, and dreams. The deeply rooted socio-economic issues are not mere policies on a page; they represent years of suffering, exclusion, and the pursuit of equality. To have a figure like Musk, a billionaire who barely resides in the country, criticize these efforts can feel like a slap in the face to those still fighting for their place at the table.
With his frustrations, Elon Musk is part of a broader discussion that extends beyond South Africa’s borders. The U.S. administration's recent moves to dismantle diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives mirror sentiments that Musk has expressed. This global conversation about equity (who gets to benefit and why) continues to stir up debates and talks across continents. Musk’s claims have sparked speculation that they may affect larger geopolitical dynamics, especially his assertion that President Trump's cut to aid for South Africa could be tied to these very discussions.
The fallout from Musk's critique of South Africa's laws will resonate far beyond the internet service he wishes to launch. At its core, this dilemma holds a mirror to society’s deeper struggles with equity, justice, and the path forward in a world that often feels divided by wealth, color, and access. This new chapter may offer the kind of lessons that every nation grappling with inequality needs to heed. After all, the balance between progress and inclusion should never be a zero-sum game.

More Articles You Might Like

A Costly Mistake? How a New $250 Visa Fee Puts a $9.4 Billion US Tourism Industry at Risk
International Desk

A Costly Mistake? How a New $250 Visa Fee Puts a $9.4 Billion US Tourism Industry at Risk

A new $250 visa fee is poised to create a significant financial barrier for African tourists, potentially costing the US economy a staggering $9.4 billion. This article explores the economic fallout of this policy, its impact on travel, and the wider implications for US-Africa relations.

8 hours ago
Discover Why the African Union is Abandoning the Colonial Map
International Desk

Discover Why the African Union is Abandoning the Colonial Map

The African Union has called for a monumental shift, urging the world to replace the centuries-old Mercator map with a new, more accurate projection. This article explores the history of the distorted map, the symbolic power of this change, and the broader debate over what truly defines Africa’s place in the world.

8 hours ago
DIRCO Fires Back: Why South Africa is Disputing the US Human Rights Report
International Desk

DIRCO Fires Back: Why South Africa is Disputing the US Human Rights Report

South Africa’s Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) has officially denounced the “South Africa 2024 Human Rights Report” from the United States as inaccurate and deeply flawed. This article explores the core disagreements between the two nations, from land expropriation and extrajudicial killings to the differing views of the UN, and the ongoing diplomatic friction caused by the report.

5 days ago